Domain-Guided Spatio-Temporal Self-Attention for Egocentric 3D Pose Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vision-based ego-centric 3D human pose estimation (ego-HPE) is essential to support critical applications of xR-technologies. However, severe self-occlusions and strong distortion introduced by the fish-eye view from the head mounted camera, make ego-HPE extremely challenging. To address these challenges, we propose a domain-guided spatio-temporal transformer model that leverages information specific to ego-views. Powered by this domain-guided transformer, we build Egocentric Spatio-Temporal Self-Attention Network (Ego-STAN), which uses 2D image representations and spatio-temporal attention to address both distortions and self-occlusions in ego-HPE. Additionally, we introduce a spatial concept called feature map tokens (FMT) which endows Ego-STAN with the ability to draw complex spatio-temporal information encoded in ego-centric videos. Our quantitative evaluation on the contemporary xR-EgoPose dataset, achieves a 38.2% improvement on the highest error joints against the SOTA ego-HPE model, while accomplishing a 22% decrease in the number of parameters. Finally, we also demonstrate the generalization capabilities of our model to real-world HPE tasks beyond ego-views achieving 7.7% improvement on 2D human pose estimation with the Human3.6M dataset. Our code is also made available at: https://github.com/jmpark0808/Ego-STAN
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".