MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385574845 · doi:10.1109/mim.2023.10208249

Simple Offset Elimination Technique for Two-Wire Measurements

2023· article· en· W4385574845 on OpenAlexaff
M.S. Obrecht

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLCR meterInductorCapacitorTest fixtureCapacitanceElectrical impedanceInductanceCapacitive sensingMaterials scienceParasitic capacitanceElectrical engineeringEquivalent series resistanceAcousticsParasitic elementOptoelectronicsElectronic engineeringEngineeringVoltagePhysicsElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measuring small inductors and capacitors can be challenging with the use of conventional LCR-meters that have a test frequency of 10 kHz or less. With a 10 nH inductor at 10 kHz, the impedance is only 6 mOhms, that is comparable to the resistance of the probes. At a frequency of 100 kHz, the impedance increases to 60 mOhms. On the other hand, a 1 pF capacitor at 10 kHz results in an impedance of 15 MOhms, which makes a capacitive connection between the probes noticeable and affects the measurement of impedance. This paper presents two case studies: an extraction the parasitic inductance of the two-wire probes using the HP4284A LCR-meter and HP16034E test fixture, and extraction of the parasitic capacitance using the LCR-Reader-R2 tweezer-meter. This method enables accurate measurements of sub-nH inductors and sub-pF capacitors using test frequencies below 300 kHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Instrumentation & Measurement MagazineSame topicAdvanced Electrical Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207