Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Cardiovascular Challenge Becoming a Contemporary Treatable Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is one of the most common genetic inherited diseases of myocardium, which is caused by mutation in genes encoding proteins for the cardiac sarcomere. It is the most frequent cause of sudden death in young people and trained athletes. All diagnostic methods, including heart catheterization, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, genetic counseling and tissue biopsy are required for risk and therapy stratification and should be individualized depending on phenotype and genotype. Current therapy has not been tested adequately. Beta-blockers and verapamil can cause hypotension which can make hypertrophic cardiomyopathy worse. Disopyramide has been inadequately studied, and mavacamten was only studied in small trials. More definitive trials are currently ongoing. Novel invasive and noninvasive diagnostics, medical therapies, interventional and surgical approaches tend to influence the natural history of the disease, favoring a better future for this patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".