High Expression of F-Box Protein 43 Is Associated With Poor Prognosis and Adjuvant Chemotherapy Resistance in Colorectal Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The F-box protein 43 (FBXO43), also referred to as endogenous meiotic inhibitor 2 (EMI2), has been linked to the advancement of various types of cancer, such as hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, and gastric cancer. Nevertheless, the precise function of FBXO43 in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. This study employed data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and clinical specimens to analyze the expression, prognostic value, and chemotherapeutic advantages of FBXO43 in CRC. Methods: Level 3 RNA sequencing data pertaining to 631 cases of colon and rectal adenocarcinomas (COAD-READ) were downloaded from TCGA. The data were utilized to analyze the expression, prognosis, and related signal pathways of FBXO43. The expression of FBXO43 in clinical samples was subsequently confirmed through the use of real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Lastly, a tissue microarray (TMA) consisting of 120 cases of CRC and corresponding normal tissues was established to investigate the relationship between FBXO43 and survival outcomes. Results: Results from both the TCGA analysis and clinical samples indicated that FBXO43 was significantly upregulated in CRC tissues in comparison to normal tissues. Moreover, high level of FBXO43 was found to be relevant to malignant clinical features, such as differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and pathological stage, as well as unfavorable prognosis in CRC patients. Subgroup analysis further demonstrated that FBXO43 could be an effective parameter for stratifying low-risk CRC patients. Notably, survival analysis showed that patients with high level of FBXO43 had worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) following adjuvant chemotherapy, and FBXO43 was distinctly upregulated in chemotherapy-resistant patients' primary CRC tissues. Conclusions: FBXO43 was upregulated and associated with poor prognosis of CRC; patients with high expression of FBXO43 may not be benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".