MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385584552 · doi:10.4000/archeopages.14920

Renouvellement des salles d’archéologie auboise du musée des Beaux-Arts et d’Archéologie de Troyes

2022· article· fr· W4385584552 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Blanchegorge

Bibliographic record

VenueArcheopages · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Créé en 1830, le musée des Beaux-arts et d’Archéologie de Troyes accueille les découvertes archéologiques locales, puis le mobilier issu des premières fouilles entreprises dans l’Aube. Il s’efforce depuis de présenter le résultat des opérations récentes, telles les plus belles découvertes issues des fouilles réalisées dans les années 1980 et 1990 (autoroute A5, transformations de l’urbanisme troyen, domus dite de Chaillouet) notamment par l’Association pour les fouilles archéologiques nationales (Afan). Ce sera toujours le cas dans le nouveau parcours lié à la réfection du musée. Ainsi, la tombe princière de Lavau, étudiée par l’Inrap, sera l’un des points d’orgue de ces salles archéologiques rénovées. Les salles archéologiques des musées se doivent de synthétiser les savoirs autour des ensembles mobiliers jugés représentatifs d’un moment de l’histoire proche ou lointaine dont nous sommes héritiers. Et cela ne peut se faire sans l’expertise évidente des chercheurs de la communauté archéologique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.233
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.010
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArcheopagesSame topicCultural Identity and HeritageFrench-language works237,207