MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385584552 · doi:10.4000/archeopages.14920

Renouvellement des salles d’archéologie auboise du musée des Beaux-Arts et d’Archéologie de Troyes

2022· article· fr· W4385584552 on OpenAlex
Éric Blanchegorge

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArcheopages · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Identity and Heritage
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Créé en 1830, le musée des Beaux-arts et d’Archéologie de Troyes accueille les découvertes archéologiques locales, puis le mobilier issu des premières fouilles entreprises dans l’Aube. Il s’efforce depuis de présenter le résultat des opérations récentes, telles les plus belles découvertes issues des fouilles réalisées dans les années 1980 et 1990 (autoroute A5, transformations de l’urbanisme troyen, domus dite de Chaillouet) notamment par l’Association pour les fouilles archéologiques nationales (Afan). Ce sera toujours le cas dans le nouveau parcours lié à la réfection du musée. Ainsi, la tombe princière de Lavau, étudiée par l’Inrap, sera l’un des points d’orgue de ces salles archéologiques rénovées. Les salles archéologiques des musées se doivent de synthétiser les savoirs autour des ensembles mobiliers jugés représentatifs d’un moment de l’histoire proche ou lointaine dont nous sommes héritiers. Et cela ne peut se faire sans l’expertise évidente des chercheurs de la communauté archéologique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.107 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it