MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385585286 · doi:10.1145/3587135.3592204

T-RecX

2023· article· en· W4385585286 on OpenAlexafffund
Nikhil Pratap Ghanathe, Steven J. E. Wilton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceClassifier (UML)SpottingBenchmark (surveying)Artificial intelligenceDeep learningKeyword spottingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionInternet of ThingsEdge deviceSuiteMachine learningEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deploying Machine learning (ML) on milliwatt-scale edge devices (tinyML) is gaining popularity due to recent breakthroughs in ML and Internet of Things (IoT). Most tinyML research focuses on model compression techniques that trade accuracy (and model capacity) for compact models to fit into the KB-sized tiny-edge devices. In this paper, we show how such models can be enhanced by the addition of an early exit intermediate classifier. If the intermediate classifier exhibits sufficient confidence in its prediction, the network exits early thereby, resulting in considerable savings in time. Although early exit classifiers have been proposed in previous work, these previous proposals focus on large networks, making their techniques suboptimal/impractical for tinyML applications. Our technique is optimized specifically for tiny-CNN sized models. In addition, we present a method to alleviate the effect of network overthinking by leveraging the representations learned by the early exit. We evaluate T-RecX on three CNNs from the MLPerf tiny benchmark suite for image classification, keyword spotting and visual wake word detection tasks. Our results show that T-RecX 1) improves the accuracy of baseline network, 2) achieves 31.58% average reduction in FLOPS in exchange for one percent accuracy across all evaluated models. Furthermore, we show that our methods consistently outperform popular prior works on the tiny-CNNs we evaluate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207