MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Data Streaming for a Tightly-Coupled Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Array

2023· article· en· W4385585417 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdi Abbaszadeh, Tarek S. Abdelrahman, Reza Azimi, Tomasz Czajkowski, Maziar Goudarzi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCacheStratixExploitGranularityReuseParallel computingThroughputCPU cacheField-programmable gate arrayHost (biology)Embedded systemOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose, implement and evaluate a data streaming unit (DSU) for a Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable Array (CGRA) that is tightly coupled to its host CPU. The DSU accesses system memory at the granularity of cache lines and streams data to CGRA cells that perform loads, and conversely from CGRA cells that perform stores. The unit supports both direct and indirect accesses, as well as dynamic accesses in which the access location is computed on the CGRA. Further, the DSU can exploit cache line reuse to feed (collect) data on the same cache line to (from) multiple CGRA cells, reducing the number of memory transactions. A prototype DSU is implemented on an Intel Stratix 10MX FPGA that is connected to external DDR4 memory. Evaluation shows that ideal data streaming throughput is achieved for common direct accesses, and for indirect ones when sparsity structure is present. Evaluation also shows that the DSU is effective in exploiting cache line reuse. Thus, we conclude that direct data streaming between memory and CGRA cells is effective.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207