MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385591361 · doi:10.1353/esc.2020.a903551

Noisy Nuisance: Chris Ireland's Aphasic Poetry

2020· article· en· W4385591361 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Katharina Fürholzer

Bibliographic record

VenueEnglish studies in Canada · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAphasiaPoetryCounterpointPsychologyPound (networking)ConfusionLinguisticsHistoryLiteratureArtPhilosophyCognitive psychologyPsychoanalysisComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Noisy Nuisance:Chris Ireland's Aphasic Poetry Katharina Fürholzer (bio) feeding your earstasting your eyestreating your spirittouching your soul Ireland and Pound 1. introductory remarks: the voices of language loss 1.1 Approaching aphasic poetry When suffering from the language impairment of aphasia (Greek: ἀφἀσίἀ = speechlessness), everyday sounds can turn into an almost intolerable noise, a stressful nuisance, a physical as well as psychological ailment creating a communicative border between aphasic patients and their environment. At the same time, aphasic language comes with its very own sounds: for instance, one may think of the stutter provoked by the anomic search for words or the use of phonetically distorted terms (so-called phonemic paraphasias), all of which can cause severe confusion and misunderstandings. In her poetry, UK-based writer Chris Ireland, who has been living with aphasia since 1988 (Ireland and Black 356), aesthetically addresses [End Page 197] the various sounds of both the aphasic and non-aphasic world and the at times exclusive "barriars" (sic, Ireland and Pound 155–56) that may accompany them. By juxtaposing or rather merging rhetorical style with pathological symptoms, Ireland's poems eventually create an aesthetic equality that forms a counterpoint to the common (communicative) hierarchies between aphasic patients and their surroundings. Interested in literary approaches to language loss, the paper at hand, which is anchored in the medical humanities while also touching on disability studies as two research fields particularly sensitive to impairment-related aspects of language, attempts to gain a better understanding of aphasic poetry. Using the example of selected works by Ireland, I will, to this end, analyze "aphasic" depictions of the sounds caused by both society and aphasia and will discuss their pathological, poetical, and sociocultural implications. Building upon that, I will conclude with a reflection on the question of genre in the context of poetic approaches to language impairment and will address the potentials and perils when approaching poetic forms of language impairment from the perspective of literary (sound) studies. Aphasiological explanations … So, what exactly is aphasia? In clinical literature, this specific form of language impairment is defined as a disorder caused by a brain lesion after completed speech acquisition (adults who had a stroke or an accident), which can affect patients' communicative and social functioning. Depending on form and gravity, partial or total recovery may be possible, either spontaneously or with therapeutic help. Aphasias can manifest in various ways, which are commonly divided into non-fluent and fluent forms. Non-fluent forms such as Broca's aphasia can be characterized, among others, by a heavily shortened style of speech, syntactically strongly reduced one- to two-word sentences, a lack of inflections and functional words (prepositions, declensions, or conjugations, which is called agrammatism or telegraphic style), an impaired speech that takes strong effect, and in times severe difficulties in finding words (anomia). Nevertheless, language comprehension usually remains relatively intact, and persons affected have a marked awareness of their disorder. By contrast, fluent forms of aphasia such as Wernicke's can manifest in long, entangled, duplicated sentences, defective forms of inflection (paragrammatism), the use of phonetic or semantic neologisms and/or phonetically distorted or semantically incorrect words (paraphasias), and an excessive flow of speech (logorrhea). In difference to cases of non-fluent [End Page 198] aphasia, the language comprehension of persons experiencing fluent forms is oftentimes heavily impaired, which in very severe cases may even lead to word deafness (auditory verbal agnosia). Despite their at times heavy impairments, people suffering from fluent aphasia are often hardly aware of their disorder.1 Aphasias can be accompanied by psychosocial impairments such as social isolation, reduced self-esteem, or depression (Hersh). This is not least due to the fact that this impairment is often mistaken for an intellectual debility—a widespread misconception within society that has been disproved by modern aphasiology from its earliest beginnings (Broca 356; Wernicke 35; for more recent literature on this matter see, for example, Hallowell 45–48). 1.3. … and aphasic expressions While aphasiologists are experts on the biological dimensions of aphasia and can thus help us to better understand its various syndromes and symptoms,2 it is the patients who are experts on the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnglish studies in CanadaSame topicNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismFrench-language works237,207