MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385597116 · doi:10.1145/3614214.3614218

Data Management Systems for the Hierarchical Edge

2023· article· en· W4385597116 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGetMobile Mobile Computing and Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge computingInternet of ThingsThe InternetComputer scienceCorporationBusinessTelecommunicationsData scienceComputer securityWorld Wide WebFinanceOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, there has been an exponential increase in the generation of data at the edge of the network. The International Data Corporation (IDC) estimates that the Global Datasphere, which was 33 zettabytes in 2018, will rise to 175 zettabytes by 2025, and there will be more than 150 billion connected devices worldwide [10]. The Internet of Things (IoT) segment is expected to experience the fastest growth, with data creation at the edge of the network projected to increase almost twice as fast as in the cloud. As a result, worldwide spending on edge computing is forecasted to reach 317 billion by 2026, as per IDC projections [1].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesOpen science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0070.012
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it