MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385597312 · doi:10.59962/9780774835992-002

Foreword

2017· book-chapter· en· W4385597312 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. L. Granatstein

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many years ago when I was teaching courses on the history of Post-Confederation Canada to third-year students at York University, I would devote four or five lectures to the Great War of 1914-18.One of my sessions invariably focused on conscription and how Sir Robert Borden, the Prime Minister, parlayed the Military Service Act, the Wartime Elections Act, and the Military Voters Act into helping him form a Union Government of Conservatives and pro-conscription Liberals.Once the Union took shape, Sir Wilfrid Laurier and the anti-conscriptionist Liberals were doomed, however loudly francophones, farmers, and labour protested against compulsory service; the results of the general election of December 17, 1917, confirmed Borden's victory.The first call-ups under the Military Service Act came in January, 1918, and before long, unhappy recruits were in training.In May the first soldiers reached the front in France and Flanders, and soon there were casualties.But there were some 620,000 men in all enlisted in the Canadian Expeditionary Force, there were 425,000 volunteers serving overseas and more in Canada, and 345,000 men and nurses served in France and Flanders, and of those 236,618 officers and other ranks served in the 50 infantry battalions in the Canadian Corps.Yet, as the charts in Colonel G.W.L. Nicholson's official history of the army in the 1914-18 War demonstrate, of the hundred thousand men conscripted in Canada, only 24,132 served in the field with the Corps before the Armistice on November 11, 1918.Only 24,132 soldiers, I told my students, and for that paltry number, French and English Canada, rural and urban Canada, labour and capital, were divided in 1917-18 as they had never been before.I am now forced to admit that I was flatly wrong to argue as I did.In the first place, 24,132 reinforcements numbered more men than were found in any one of the four divisions of the Canadian Corps.That was a substantial number, almost one quarter of the strength of the Corps' ranks.Then too, the war had been expected by the Allied generals and politicians to continue well into 1919; if that had occurred, the full hundred thousand conscripts -and perhaps more, if necessary -would have reached the front.And those conscripts were essential if the Canadian Corps' forty-eight infantry battalions were to keep their ranks at full strength.Understrength battalions suffered more casualties

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.722
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7220.718

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks→Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→