Bibliographic record
Abstract
T he research and writing for this book was done in many places.I want to begin by acknowledging these places where I have lived and the obligations to Indigenous legal orders when one moves around.Th e imposition of municipal, provincial, and even federal laws and regulations upon moving to a new place is pronounced -changing licences, contact information, health information, "responsibly" ensuring that material possessions and even human life get insured.Th ese settler-colonial legal logics about how one should start off living in a place erase important questions about where one is actually living, what its history is, and what obligations one has to others in the present.Th ese questions are especially important to me as a white settler living on Indigenous lands.As I wrote the fi nal revisions for this book, I was living in misâskwatôminiskâhk (Saskatoon) in Treaty 6 territory on Cree and Métis homelands.Prior to this, I was living in and travelling around Haudenosaunee and Anishinaabe territory (in southern Ontario), working at the University of Waterloo.While there, I was also returning to many places where I spent my childhood, with my mom, dad, sister, grandparents, aunties, and uncles.Previous to that move, when the work for this book was in its earlier stages, I lived in Coast Salish territory, and before that I spent much time in amiskwaciwaskahikan (Edmonton) on Cree and Métis territory.Th ough I was living in Treaty 6 territory, I also travelled often to Treaty 8 territory, where my partner, Brock, and his family are from.He, along with many brothers, sisters, and cousins, was raised in a Cree and Métis family by his mom, dad, aunties, and uncles.It is also
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.512 | 0.275 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".