MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385600827 · doi:10.59962/9780774826297-002

Acknowledgments

2015· book-chapter· en· W4385600827 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersQueen's UniversityUniversity of SussexUniversity of ManchesterQueen's University BelfastUniversity of Essex
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I usually feel blessed that I have so many wonderful people in my life to be thankful to.However, I've learned late in the day that when it comes to writing acknowledgments, my fear of overlooking somebody crucial might have been allayed by having fewer people to thank!First and most importantly, I would like to thank the Friends of Clayoquot Sound and all those whom I interviewed in Clayoquot, elsewhere on Vancouver Island, and in Vancouver, who invited me into their lives and homes -this book would not be possible without their considerable generosity in sharing their lives with me.I want to thank John Othick and the Centre of Canadian Studies, Queen's University Belfast, for the initial funding to go to Clayoquot, long before I had this book in mind.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.486
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5140.273

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of British Columbia Press eBooks→Same topicHuman auditory perception and evaluation→French-language works237,207→