Supervised Dimensionality Reduction of Proportional Data Using Exponential Family Distributions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most well-known supervised dimensionality reduction algorithms suffer from the curse of dimensionality while handling high-dimensional sparse data due to ill-conditioned second-order statistics matrices. They also do not deal with multi-modal data properly since they construct neighborhood graphs that do not discriminate between multi-modal classes of data and single-modal ones. In this paper, a novel method that mitigates the above problems is proposed. In this method, assuming the data is from two classes, they are projected into the low-dimensional space in the first step which removes sparsity from the data and reduces the time complexity of any operation drastically afterwards. These projected data are modeled using a mixture of exponential family distributions for each class, allowing the modeling of multi-modal data. A measure for the similarity between the two projected classes is used as an objective function for constructing an optimization problem, which is then solved using a heuristic search algorithm to find the best separating projection. The conducted experiments show that the proposed method outperforms the rest of the compared algorithms and provides a robust effective solution to the problem of dimensionality reduction even in the presence of multi-modal and sparse data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".