Feasibility of high-resolution perfusion imaging using Arterial Spin Labelling MRI at 3 Tesla
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is a critical physiological parameter of brain health and it can be non-invasively measured with arterial spin labelling (ASL) MRI. In this study, we evaluated and optimised whole-brain, high-resolution ASL as an alternative to the low-resolution ASL employed in the routine assessment of CBF in both healthy participants and patients. Two high-resolution protocols (i.e., pCASL and FAIR-Q2TIPS (PASL) with 2 mm isotropic voxels) were compared to a default clinical pCASL protocol (3.4 × 3.4 × 4 mm 3 ), all of whom had an acquistion time of ≈ 5 min. We assessed the impact of high-resolution acquisition on reducing partial voluming and improving sensitivity to the perfusion signal, and evaluated the effectiveness of z-deblurring on the ASL data. We compared the quality of whole-brain ASL acquired using three available head coils with differing number of receive channels (i.e., 20, 32 and 64 ch). We found using higher coil counts (32 and 64 ch coils as compared to 20 ch) offer improved SNR and improved acceleration capabilities that are beneficial for ASL imaging at 3T. The inherent reduction in partial voluming effects with higher resolution acquisitions improves the resolving power of perfusion without impacting sensitivity. In conclusion, our results suggest that high-resolution ASL (2 - 2.5 mm isotropic) has the potential to become a new standard for perfusion imaging at 3 T and increase its adoption into clinical research and cognitive neuroscience applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".