Characterization of nonencapsulated <i>Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae</i> serovar K12:O3 isolates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae isolates from clinical cases of porcine pleuropneumonia were positive by capsular serovar 12–specific PCR assay, but not reactive to antiserum prepared against serovar 12 using the rapid slide agglutination (RSA) test. The isolates were positive for apxIICA, apxIIICA, apxIBD, apxIIIBD, and apxIVA in the PCR toxin gene assay, which is the profile seen in serovars 2, 4, 6, 8, and 15, and reacted with antisera against serovars 3, 6, 8, 15, and 17. Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that genes involved in the biosynthesis of capsular polysaccharide of the 3 isolates were identical or nearly identical to those of serovar 12. However, genes involved in the biosynthesis of O-polysaccharide of the 3 isolates were highly similar to those of reference strains of serovars 3, 6, 8, 15, 17, and 19. In agreement with results from the RSA test, transmission electron microscopic analysis confirmed the absence of detectable capsular material in the 3 isolates. The existence of nonencapsulated A. pleuropneumoniae serovar K12:O3 would hamper precise serodetection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".