A framework for multi-faceted content analysis of social media chatter regarding non-medical use of prescription medications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Substance use, including the non-medical use of prescription medications, is a global health problem resulting in hundreds of thousands of overdose deaths and other health problems. Social media has emerged as a potent source of information for studying substance use-related behaviours and their consequences. Mining large-scale social media data on the topic requires the development of natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning frameworks customized for this problem. Our objective in this research is to develop a framework for conducting a content analysis of Twitter chatter about the non-medical use of a set of prescription medications. Methods: (stimulant), and identified posts that indicated non-medical use using an automatic machine learning classifier. In our NLP framework, we applied supervised named entity recognition (NER) to identify other substances mentioned, symptoms, and adverse events. We applied unsupervised topic modelling to identify latent topics associated with the chatter for each medication. Results: The quantitative analysis demonstrated the performance of the proposed NER approach in identifying substance-related entities from data with a high degree of accuracy compared to the baseline methods. The performance evaluation of the topic modelling was also notable. The qualitative analysis revealed knowledge about the use, non-medical use, and side effects of these medications in individuals and communities. Conclusions: NLP-based analyses of Twitter chatter associated with prescription medications belonging to different categories provide multi-faceted insights about their use and consequences. Our developed framework can be applied to chatter about other substances. Further research can validate the predictive value of this information on the prevention, assessment, and management of these disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".