MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385615705 · doi:10.53103/cjess.v3i3.140

Teacher’s Professional Development and Internal Efficiency in Cameroon: A case study of Some Primary Schools in Nyong and Mfoumou Division

2023· article· en· W4385615705 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Educational and Social Studies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Technology Integration
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCurriculumProfessional developmentPsychologyAccidental samplingTest (biology)Medical educationPopulationMathematics educationPedagogySociologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the teacher’s professional development and internal efficiency in state primary schools in the Nyong and Mfoumou Division. The problem arises from a rippling fall in the internal efficiency in primary schools perceived in low input and poor quality of in-service training. Teachers’ interest is derelict during in-service training, they are not provided real-time ICT tools, and they lack curriculum knowledge and classroom leadership style. This study adopts the descriptive survey research design. The population was made up of primary school teachers in the division. Via a simple random sampling technique and the Krejcie and Morgan table, we employed a sample size of 115 participants. The data was collected using a close-ended questionnaire which was pre-tested and gave a coefficient value of .828. The information was analyzed via SPSS version 23.0. Both inferential and Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data and the Spearman correlation index was used to test research hypotheses. The findings exhibited that poor teacher professional development in the division significantly impedes internal efficiency in the primary schools in the division. Based on the findings, we recommend that schools should organize professional training for teachers and the training should be focused on pedagogy, curriculum, and leadership.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.281
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Educational and Social StudiesSame topicEducation and Technology IntegrationFrench-language works237,207