MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385620773 · doi:10.1063/5.0159941

Topological analysis of information-theoretic quantities in density functional theory

2023· article· en· W4385620773 on OpenAlexaff
Xin He, Tian Lu, Chunying Rong, Shubin Liu, Paul W. Ayers, Wenjian Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hunan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInformation theoryKullback–Leibler divergenceStatistical physicsDensity functional theoryDivergence (linguistics)Mutual informationEntropy (arrow of time)AromaticityTopology (electrical circuits)Fisher informationComputer scienceMathematicsComputational chemistryPhysicsMoleculeChemistryQuantum mechanicsMachine learningArtificial intelligenceStatisticsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have witnessed considerable research interest in the recent literature about the development and applications of quantities from the information-theoretic approach (ITA) in density functional theory. These ITA quantities are explicit density functionals, whose local distributions in real space are continuous and well-behaved. In this work, we further develop ITA by systematically analyzing the topological behavior of its four representative quantities, Shannon entropy, two forms of Fisher information, and relative Shannon entropy (also called information gain or Kullback-Leibler divergence). Our results from their topological analyses for 103 molecular systems provide new insights into bonding interactions and physiochemical properties, such as electrophilicity, nucleophilicity, acidity, and aromaticity. We also compare our results with those from the electron density, electron localization function, localized orbital locator, and Laplacian functions. Our results offer a new methodological approach and practical tool for applications that are especially promising for elucidating chemical bonding and reactivity propensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207