Field assessment of elastic full-waveform inversion of combined accelerometer and distributed acoustic sensing data in a vertical seismic profile configuration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Seismic data are a significant facilitator for monitoring in carbon capture and sequestration projects, providing high-resolution images of fluid migration, using, for example, full-waveform inversion (FWI). Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS), a relatively novel technology for wavefield sampling, is well suited for this type of monitoring. Using noninvasive optical fibers, DAS allows for dense spatial sampling along the entire length of the wellbore, without disrupting operations. Permanently installed in the wellbore, typically behind casing, DAS offers highly repeatable and dense sampling of the transmitted wave modes crucial to seismic monitoring of injected carbon dioxide (CO2). However, the DAS data consist of measurements of strain along the tangent of the fiber and therefore do not transfer directly to conventional FWI algorithms. Incorporation of DAS data in their native strain (or strain-rate) form in standard FWI algorithms, requires changing the definition of the receiver sampling operator to use geometric information about the fiber to supply tangential strain measurements to the FWI residual. The theoretical developments are applied to invert field vertical seismic profile data acquired with DAS fiber and accelerometers at a CO2 sequestration site in Newell Country, Alberta. Our method incorporates DAS data and accelerometer data in one objective function and allows us to tune the relative importance we wish to place on each data set. This method also transfers to noncollocated sensors, for example, surface-deployed geophones and borehole fiber. The inverted models contain features expected from the geology of the field site, and data modeled in the inverted models compare favorably with the field data for these sensor types. The models are derived from data acquired prior to CO2 injection, representing baseline models for future time-lapse studies planned at the field research station.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".