Outcomes of Cardioversion During Pregnancy: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Rising incidence of cardiac arrhythmias among pregnant women is an increasing concern in the United States. Although pregnancy rates continue to decline in the United States, maternal morbidity and mortality remain on the rise. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the use of electric cardioversion for pregnant women and the potential maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Methods: Patient data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1993 to 2019. The data included patients that had an ICD-9 diagnosis with either a normal or high risk pregnancy. Patients were separated by whether they had a procedure to restore cardiac rhythm. Results and conclusion: Our retrospective study showed that pregnant patients who underwent cardioversion did experience a higher rate of mortality (odds ratio = 6.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.95 - 20.96; P = 0.002), with no difference in perinatal outcomes. There was no difference in perinatal outcomes. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2023;12(2):39-45 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo884
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.063 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".