Enhancing Learning Processes: The Impact of Guidance and Counseling Programs on Visually Impaired High School Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examines the role and effect of a guidance and counseling program on the learning processes of visually impaired students within an inclusive educational environment. The study investigates the implementation of principles and services offered by the program to address the specific needs of visually impaired students. The study was conducted in several senior high schools that provide inclusive education in Bandung and its surrounding areas. The study employs a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches to align with the characteristics of the challenges faced by visually impaired students. The findings reveal various difficulties visually impaired students encounter during their learning processes. In response, teachers and counselors provide guidance and counseling interventions to support students in overcoming these challenges. The programs implemented address the immediate educational obstacles and foster students’ self-confidence, encouraging their pursuit of higher education opportunities, such as entering university. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by shedding light on the significance of guidance and counseling programs tailored to visually impaired high school students' unique needs. The findings underscore the importance of incorporating comprehensive support systems within inclusive educational settings to enhance visually impaired students’ learning experiences and outcomes. The study’s implications highlight the potential for further research and the need for policymakers and educational institutions to prioritize developing and implementing effective guidance and counseling programs for visually impaired students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".