MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385638583 · doi:10.1038/s44161-023-00312-z

Assessment of left ventricular tissue mitochondrial bioenergetics in patients with stable coronary artery disease

2023· article· en· W4385638583 on OpenAlexafffund
Richard E. Jones, Anja V. Gruszczyk, Christina Schmidt, Daniel Hammersley, Lukáš Mach, Michael Lee, Joyce Wong, Ming Yang, Suzan Hatipoğlu, Amrit Lota, Sam N. Barnett, Rebecca Toscano-Rivalta, Ruth Owen, Shahzad G. Raja, Fabio De Robertis, Hassiba Smail, Anthony DeSouza, Ulrich A. Stock, Peter Kellman, Julian L. Griffin, Marc‐Emmanuel Dumas, Jack L. Martin, Kourosh Saeb‐Parsy, Ali Vazir, John G.F. Cleland, Dudley J. Pennell, Sunil Bhudia, Brian P. Halliday, Michela Noseda, Christian Frezza, Michael P. Murphy, Sanjay Prasad

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Cardiovascular Research · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome Centre
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research CentreNational Institutes of HealthCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueCentre hospitalier régional universitaire de LilleConseil Régional Hauts-de-FranceUniversity of AberdeenInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleUniversity of GlasgowDeutsches Zentrum für Herz-KreislaufforschungUniversität zu KölnImperial College LondonBritish Heart FoundationBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchEuropean CommissionUniversité de LilleMcGill UniversityAnglia Ruskin UniversityMedical Research CouncilIsrael Cancer Research FundWellcome TrustCancer Research UKBritish Society for Heart FailureLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungCHIST-ERAAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsCoronary artery diseaseInternal medicineCardiologyEjection fractionMedicineIschemiaArteryPerfusionGlycolysisOxidative phosphorylationHeart failureBiologyMetabolismBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recurrent myocardial ischemia can lead to left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In this observational cohort study, we assessed for chronic metabolomic and transcriptomic adaptations within LV myocardium of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. During surgery, paired transmural LV biopsies were acquired on the beating heart from regions with and without evidence of inducible ischemia on preoperative stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. From 33 patients, 63 biopsies were acquired, compared to analysis of LV samples from 11 donor hearts. The global myocardial adenosine triphosphate (ATP):adenosine diphosphate (ADP) ratio was reduced in patients with CAD as compared to donor LV tissue, with increased expression of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes encoding the electron transport chain complexes across multiple cell types. Paired analyses of biopsies obtained from LV segments with or without inducible ischemia revealed no significant difference in the ATP:ADP ratio, broader metabolic profile or expression of ventricular cardiomyocyte genes implicated in OXPHOS. Differential metabolite analysis suggested dysregulation of several intermediates in patients with reduced LV ejection fraction, including succinate. Overall, our results suggest that viable myocardium in patients with stable CAD has global alterations in bioenergetic and transcriptional profile without large regional differences between areas with or without inducible ischemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Cardiovascular ResearchSame topicCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsFrench-language works237,207