MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385639740 · doi:10.55616/jitu.v4i1.562

Analisa Lapis Pondasi Dengan Metode Sand Cone

2023· article· id· W4385639740 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annas Fahlevi isma

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Teknik Unida · 2023
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and construction materials studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesForestryGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jalan adalah suatu prasarana transportasi darat yang melayani perpindahan orang dan barang secara aman, nyaman, dan ekonomis dari satu tempat ke tempat lain. Perkembangan pertumbuhan penduduk menyebabkan berkurangnya jaringan jalan akibat pertambahan jumlah kendaraan yang terus bertambah setiap tahunnya dari 10% menjadi 55% per tahun, tidak sebanding dengan pertambahan panjangnya. Dari jalan. hanya sekitar 1,9% per tahun, agar pembutan jalan sesuai dengan ketentuan dan agar jalan yang baru dibangun tidak mudah rusak dengan test kepadatan pada lapisan pondasi jalan,metode yang digunakan adalah sandcone adalah metode uji kepadatan dilapangan dengan cara menggunakan Pasir Ottawa untuk menjadi parameter dari kepadatan tanah tersebut. Pasir ini memiliki sifat bersih, kering, keras dan dapat mengalir bebas ke sela-sela karena tidak mengandung zat pengikat. Pasir Ottawa yang di gunakan untuk pengujian ini adalah pasir yang lolos pada saringan nomor 10 dan bertahan pada saringan nomor 200. Pengujian yang di uraikan butiran tanah serta batuan diameternya kurang dari 5 cm. Yang sesuai pada kepadatan lapangan adalah berat kering persatuan isi,Kepadatan yang di peroleh dari setiap titik harus memenuhi syarat yaitu > 100 % ,juga kadar air harus terpenuhi yaitu 6,0% – 6,4% yang dimana kadar air minimal adalah 6,0% dan maximal 6,5%, Agar didapatkan kepadatan yang sesuai dengan ketentuan AASHTO T 191-96

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmiah Teknik UnidaSame topicGeotechnical and construction materials studiesFrench-language works237,207