MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385650189 · doi:10.3390/pr11082376

Industrial Data-Driven Processing Framework Combining Process Knowledge for Improved Decision Making—Part 1: Framework Development

2023· article· en· W4385650189 on OpenAlexaff
Émilie Thibault, Jeffrey D. Kelly, Francis Lebreux Désilets, Moncef Chioua, Bruno Poulin, Paul Stuart

Bibliographic record

VenueProcesses · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFault detection and isolationProcess (computing)Cluster analysisData processingData collectionData miningProcess engineeringIndustrial engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data management systems are increasingly used in industrial processes. However, data collected as part of industrial process operations, such as sensor or measurement instruments data, contain various sources of errors that can hamper process analysis and decision making. The authors propose an operating-regime-based data processing framework for industrial process decision making. The framework was designed to increase the quality and take advantage of available process data use to make informed offline strategic business operation decisions, i.e., environmental, cost and energy analysis, optimization, fault detection, debottlenecking, etc. The approach was synthesized from best practices derived from the available framework and improved upon its predecessor by putting forward the combination of process expertise and data-driven approaches. This systematic and structured approach includes the following stages: (1) scope of the analysis, (2) signal processing, (3) steady-state operating periods detection, (4) data reconciliation and (5) operating regime detection and identification. The proposed framework is applied to the brownstock washing department of a dissolving pulp mill. Over a 5-month period, the process was found to be in steady-state 32% of the time. Twenty (20) distinct operating regimes were identified. Further processing with the help of data reconciliation techniques, principal component analysis and k-means clustering showed that the main drivers explaining the operating regimes are the pulp level in tanks, its density, and the shower wash water flow rate. Additionally, it was concluded that the top four persistently problematic sensors across the steady-state spans that would need to be verified are three flow meters (06FIC137, 06FIC152, and 06FIC433), and one consistency sensor (06NIC423). This information was relayed to process experts contacts at the plant for further investigation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcessesSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207