MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385651241 · doi:10.1016/s2352-3018(23)00136-4

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to long-acting cabotegravir plus rilpivirine versus continuing fixed-dose bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide in virologically suppressed adults with HIV, 12-month results (SOLAR): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b, non-inferiority trial

2023· article· en· W4385651241 on OpenAlexaff
Moti Ramgopal, Antonella Castagna, Charles Cazanave, Vicens Díaz-Brito, Robin Dretler, Shinichi Oka, Olayemi Osiyemi, Sharon Walmsley, James J. Sims, Giovanni Di Perri, Kenneth Sutton, Denise Sutherland‐Phillips, Alessandro Berni, Christine L. Latham, Feifan Zhang, Ronald D’Amico, Miguel Pascual Bernáldez, Rodica Van Solingen‐Ristea, Veerle Van Eygen, Parul Patel, Vasiliki Chounta, William Spreen, H Garges, Kimberly Y. Smith, Jean van Wyk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet HIV · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health Network
FundersViiV Healthcare
KeywordsEmtricitabineRilpivirineMedicineTenofovir alafenamideDolutegravirInternal medicinePopulationTolerabilityAdverse effectHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)VirologyViral loadAntiretroviral therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet HIVSame topicHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentFrench-language works237,207