Nutritional support for adult patients with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis: outcomes in a programmatic cohort nested within the RATIONS trial in Jharkhand, India
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Undernutrition is a common comorbidity of tuberculosis in countries with a high tuberculosis burden, such as India. RATIONS is a field-based, cluster-randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of providing nutritional support to household contacts of adult patients with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis in Jharkhand, India, on tuberculosis incidence. The patient cohort in both groups of the trial was provided with nutritional support. In this study, we assessed the effects of nutritional support on tuberculosis mortality, treatment success, and other outcomes in the RATIONS patient cohort. Methods We enrolled patients (aged 18 years or older) with microbiologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis across 28 tuberculosis units. Patients received nutritional support in the form of food rations (1200 kcal and 52 g of protein per day) and micronutrient pills. Nutritional support was for 6 months for drug-susceptible tuberculosis and 12 months for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis; patients with drug-susceptible tuberculosis could receive an extension of up to 6 months if their BMI was less than 18·5 kg/m 2 at the end of treatment. We recorded BMI, diabetes status, and modified Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status at baseline. Clinical outcomes (treatment success, tuberculosis mortality, loss to follow-up, and change in performance status) and weight gain were recorded at 6 months. We assessed the predictors of tuberculosis mortality with Poisson and Cox regression using adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). The RATIONS trial is registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/08/020490). Findings Between Aug 16, 2019, and Jan 31, 2021, 2800 patients (mean age 41·5 years [SD 14·5]; 1979 [70·7%] men and 821 [29·3%] women) were enrolled. At enrolment, 2291 (82·4%) patients were underweight (BMI <18·5 kg/m 2 ), and 480 (17·3%) had a BMI of less than 14 kg/m 2 . The mean weight and BMI were 42·6 kg (SD 7·8) and 16·4 kg/m 2 (2·6) in men and 36·1 kg (7·3) and 16·2 kg/m 2 (2·9) in women. During the 6-month follow-up, treatment was successful in 2623 (93·7%) patients, 108 (3·9%) tuberculosis deaths occurred, 28 (1·0%) patients were lost to follow-up, and treatment failure was experienced by five (0·2%) patients. The median weight gain was 4·6 kg (IQR 2·8–6·8), but 1441 (54·8%) of 2630 patients remained underweight. At 2 months, 1444 (54·0%) of 2676 patients gained at least 5% of baseline weight. Baseline weight (adjusted IRR 0·95, 95% CI 0·90–0·99), BMI (0·88, 0·76–1·01), poor performance status (ECOG categories 3–4; 5·33, 2·90–9·79), diabetes (3·30, 1·65–6·72), and haemoglobin (0·85, 0·71–1·00) were predictors of tuberculosis mortality. A reduced hazard of death (adjusted HR 0·39, 95% CI 0·18–0·86) was associated with a 5% weight gain at 2 months. Interpretation In this study, nutritional support was provided to a cohort with a high prevalence of severe undernutrition. Weight gain, particularly in the first 2 months, was associated with a substantially decreased hazard of tuberculosis mortality. Nutritional support needs to be an integral component of patient-centred care to improve treatment outcomes in such settings. Funding India Tuberculosis Research Consortium, Indian Council of Medical Research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".