MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385656500 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2023.3296481

Practical Finite-Time Stability of Nonlinear Systems With Delayed Impulsive Control

2023· article· en· W4385656500 on OpenAlexafffund
Qiang Xi, Xinzhi Liu, Xiaodi Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSettling timeControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemStability (learning theory)Lyapunov functionMathematicsTime domainControl (management)Computer scienceEngineeringControl engineeringStep responsePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article investigates the practical finite-time stability (PFTS) issue of continuous-time nonlinear systems with disturbance. Some extended Lyapunov results for semi-global/global PFTS, including attraction domain and settling time estimation are obtained based on a relaxed Lyapunov condition. Especially, for systems with stabilizing delayed impulses, a new scheme of delayed impulsive control involving a finite number of impulses is proposed to realize semi-global and/or global PFTS, where the minimum number of impulses can be explicitly designed in terms of initial states. Optimal delayed impulsive control design is provided in different situations to yield the minimum settling time estimation. Several numerical examples illustrate the validity of the obtained results finally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207