MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4385657118 · doi:10.1017/9781788211062.009

A Global Precariat

2018· other· en· W4385657118 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEmployment and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEconomic geographyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The massive expansion and acceleration of capital accumulation and the almost universal real subsumption of labour in the one-time non-capitalist and radical nationalist areas of the globe are generating a new global working class, coming under the sway of capital on a global scale for the first time and subject to similar pressures and reacting in similar ways. In the North the precarious and insecure nature of most work, especially in the wake of the 2007–9 global capitalist recession, has increased dramatically. Some have suggested that a new social subject has emerged: a “precariat”, which now constitutes a “dangerous class” akin to the urban poor in Victorian Britain (Standing 2011). For the millions of workers and urban poor in the global South, precariousness has always been a characteristic of work. What we see now, however, is the emergence of a truly global precariat with different forms and degrees of exploitation but sharing features and, above all, a common interest in the democratization of the global economy and the establishment of social control over the rule of blind market forces. In recent years there has been an intense debate around the concept of the “precariat”. We saw, for example, The Economist , on the 200th anniversary of Marx’s birth, telling its readership among the international financial elite: Yet once again Marx’s argument is gaining urgency. The gig economy is assembling a reserve force of atomised labourers who wait to be summoned, via electronic foremen, to deliver people’s food, clean their houses or act as their chauffeurs … Marx’s proletariat is being reborn as the precariat. ( The Economist 2018) Undoubtedly, this has been beneficial in focusing attention on the workers of the world and how their condition has been impacted by globalization. The term has been questioned by many experienced researchers and analysts (e.g. Breman 2013; Palmer 2013) and has even generated a special issue of the Global Labour Journal (May 2016, entitled “Politics of Precarity – Critical Engagements with Guy Standing”).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0070.008
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEmployment and Welfare Studies→French-language works237,207→