MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385658293 · doi:10.1080/87559129.2023.2245030

The Application of Glass Transition Temperature in the Frying of Starchy Foods: A Review

2023· review· en· W4385658293 on OpenAlexaff
Jalal Dehghannya, Michael Ngadi

Bibliographic record

VenueFood Reviews International · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMicroencapsulation and Drying Processes
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlass transitionFood scienceMaterials sciencePlasticizerMoistureDifferential scanning calorimetryThermal stabilityChemistryComposite materialThermodynamicsPolymerPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Investigating the glass transition temperature (Tg) of fried foods helps comprehend their physiochemical, and thermal characteristics, which are crucial in controlling their quality, stability, and safety during processing and storage. During the phase transition, substantial alterations happen in the physical properties of fried foods, such as molecular mobility, viscosity, and elasticity, due to variations in moisture and temperature, leading to the development of the structure. This study aimed to review the importance and concept of glass transition temperature (Tg), and changes in the physical properties of starchy products controlled by this phenomenon. The influence of water sorption, pre- and post-frying treatments, frying time, and food composition on Tg during frying was also reviewed. Moreover, the effect of Tg on textural characteristics of fried foods, including crispness, crust formation, and collapse, as well as measurement techniques of Tg, were covered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFood Reviews InternationalSame topicMicroencapsulation and Drying ProcessesFrench-language works237,207