Investigating the initial steps of auricin biosynthesis using synthetic biology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Streptomyces lavendulae subsp. lavendulae CCM 3239 (formerly Streptomyces aureofaciens CCM 3239) contains a type II polyketide synthase (PKS) biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) aur1 whose genes were highly similar to angucycline BGCs. However, its product auricin is structurally different from all known angucyclines. It contains a spiroketal pyranonaphthoquinone aglycone similar to griseusins and is modified with D-forosamine. Here, we describe the characterization of the initial steps in auricin biosynthesis using a synthetic-biology-based approach. We have created a plasmid system based on the strong kasOp* promoter, RBS and phage PhiBT1-based integration vector, where each gene in the artificial operon can be easily replaced by another gene using unique restriction sites surrounding each gene in the operon. The system was validated with the initial landomycin biosynthetic genes lanABCFDLE, leading to the production of rabelomycin after its integration into Streptomyces coelicolor M1146. However, the aur1DEFCGHA homologous genes from the auricin aur1 BGC failed to produce rabelomycin in this system. The cause of this failure was inactive aur1DE genes encoding ketosynthases α and β (KSα, KSβ). Their replacement with homologous aur2AB genes from the adjacent aur2 BGC resulted in rabelomycin production that was even higher after the insertion of two genes from the aur1 BGC, aur1L encoding 4-phosphopantetheinyl transferase (PPTase) and aur1M encoding malonyl-CoA:ACP transacylase (MCAT), suggesting that Aur1L PPTase is essential for the activation of the acyl carrier protein Aur1F. These results suggest an interesting communication of two BGCs, aur1 and aur2, in the biosynthesis of the initial structure of auricin aglycone.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".