CALCULATION AND TESTING OF A REINFORCED CONICAL BRIDGE BEAM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The paper addresses the compliance of the actual strength and deformation properties of the standard precast block (hereinafter — UPB 185.25) with the design data. Purpose of the study: We aimed to check convergence of the experimental data for a reinforced concrete beam with variable outline of the bottom chord with the design assumptions. Methods: In the course of the study, the moments of inertia at each section of the unit were taken averaged, in steps. Each section was calculated separately. The results were then summed up. In addition, the calculated values were verified using the finite element method in MIDAS. Results: The adopted design assumptions based on the test results showed high convergence of the results and confirmed the compliance of the beam in terms of stiffness, crack resistance, and strength. The control crack opening width acr = 0.2 mm was achieved at a load of 503.2 kg, which is 22.7 % higher than the design load.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".