MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385669960 · doi:10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.751

Barriers and facilitators towards recovery and health service utilization among Haredi Jews with mental illness

2023· article· en· W4385669960 on OpenAlexaff
Rob Whitley, Eric Jarvis, M.-N. Le Blanc, Elisabeth Rohr

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Psychiatry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthThematic analysisDistressReligiosityMental distressPsychologyMental illnessQualitative researchNursingMedicinePsychiatryClinical psychologySocial psychologySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Evidence suggests that minorities tend to under-utilize mental health services, and may face specific barriers and facilitators towards recovery. One community which remains particularly under-researched in the Western World are Haredi Jews — a diverse group of individuals characterized by a shared devotion to traditional Talmudic and Halakhah teachings and observances. Objectives The overarching aim of this study is to document and analyze barriers and facilitators towards recovery and mental health service utilization among Haredi Jews with a history of mental distress. Specific objectives include: (i) eliciting and understanding participants’ mental health knowledge, beliefs, behaviours & attitudes; (ii) exploring their pathways and barriers to mental health care, especially examining the role of religiosity, religious community and rabbinical advice; and (iii) investigating their experience within the official mental health care system. Methods To gain an in-depth understanding, we conducted a qualitative study. This involved semi-structured interviews with 24 participants who (i) identified as Haredi Jews; (ii) had used mental health services; and (iii) were 18+ years of age. It also included interviews with several key stakeholders, for example local Rabbis and other community leaders. Data was analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. Results Participants typically had experienced mild to moderate mental distress, and tended to view mental health services in a positive light, mainly expressing satisfaction with services received. The analysis revealed three important facilitators and three important barriers to recovery. Facilitators comprised of (i) high levels of social support within the community, including specific well-being support groups; (ii) a positive relationship and connection with G-d, considered to provide guidance and support during troubled times; and (iii) the presence of many bridges and resources within the local Haredi community, including community-run health services, and Rabbis who encouraged mental health care utilization where appropriate. Barriers comprised of (i) stigma related to marriageability of self and offspring, inhibiting disclosure and mental health care use; (ii) acknowledged lack of awareness and knowledge about mental health, mental illness, treatments, and therapies; and (iii) generic health service issues, including long waitlists, limited availability and lack of appropriate therapists. Conclusions Study participants tended to have positive views of psychiatric services, and utilized different health care and community-based resources to help foster recovery. However, ongoing issues of stigma and low levels of mental health literacy may inhibit mental health care use and recovery. This implies a need for religiously-informed and community-grounded mental health literacy campaigns among Haredi Jewish communities. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean PsychiatrySame topicReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207