MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385670584 · doi:10.7860/jcdr/2023/63345.18238

Effect of Home-Based versus Clinic-Based Exercise Training on Balance and Function in the Geriatric Population with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Non Randomised Controlled Trial

2023· article· en· W4385670584 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPhysical Education and Training Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysical therapyMedicineWOMACBerg Balance ScaleBalance (ability)OsteoarthritisTimed Up and Go testMann–Whitney U testWilcoxon signed-rank testPopulationDynamic balanceRandomized controlled trialPhysical medicine and rehabilitationBalance trainingKnee painAlternative medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Knee Osteoarthritis (OA) affects 30-40% of the population worldwide by the age of 65 years and is associated with proprioception loss, postural instability, and fall risk. Strengthening and balance exercises at home can prevent these issues. The Otago home exercise program is commonly used for fall prevention in the elderly. Aim: To compare the effects of home-based and clinic-based exercise training on balance and function in geriatric individuals with knee OA. Materials and Methods: A non randomised controlled trial (NRCT) was conducted from October 2017 to December 2017 at an old age home and residential zone of Ahmedabad city. Nineteen participants were divided into two groups: group A (home-based exercise) with nine participants, and group B (clinicbased exercise) with ten participants. The exercises were based on the Otago program. The study duration was eight weeks, and outcome measures included the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) for static and dynamic balance, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) for physical function, the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test for dynamic balance, and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for knee pain. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0, employing the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests for within group and between group comparisons, respectively. Results: Group A (home-based exercise) showed significant improvements in BBS (p-value=0.007), WOMAC (p-value=0.007), and TUG (p-value=0.027). Group B (clinic-based exercise) also showed significant improvements in BBS (p=0.005), WOMAC (p=0.005), and TUG (p=0.041). When comparing the two groups, significant differences were found in BBS (p=0.013) and WOMAC (p=0.039), but not in TUG (p=0.864) and VAS (p=0.908). The clinic-based exercise group demonstrated greater improvement, as indicated by higher pre and postintervention readings. Conclusion: This study concludes that both home-based and clinic-based exercises are effective in improving balance and physical function in geriatric individuals with knee OA. However, clinic-based exercise interventions showed greater improvement, as evidenced by higher pre and postintervention readings in the clinic-based exercise group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.046
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.046
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.172
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it