Characteristics of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Wild-Type Transthyretin Amyloidosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common extra-cardiac manifestations of wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis (wtATTR); however, the characteristics of CTS in this population remain poorly understood. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reports findings from a single-centre experience of comprehensive neurological screening at the time of wtATTR diagnosis by nerve conduction studies (NCS) and neurologist assessment. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients underwent neurological screening, 73 (92%) males, mean age 79.2 ± 7.5 years. Seventy-four (94%) had electrodiagnostic findings of median neuropathy at the wrist (MNW), 37 (50%) of which had a prior diagnosis of CTS and 37 (50%) had a new diagnosis of MNW. Over half of wtATTR patients (42, 53%) had bilateral MNW on screening. Most with pre-existing CTS had bilateral disease (28, 76%) and underwent bilateral carpal tunnel release (CTR) (23, 62%) prior to screening. Twenty-one (19%) wrists had mild MNW, 43 (38%) moderate and 49 (43%) severe. Twenty-one (28%) wtATTR patients with MNW were asymptomatic, 10 of which (48%) had moderate disease. Nineteen (36%) wtATTR patients with symptomatic MNW had recurrent disease despite previous CTR. As a result of screening, 36 (68%) patients with symptomatic MNW were referred for CTR. CONCLUSIONS: MNW is exceptionally common at the time of wtATTR diagnosis, affecting 94% of our patients. Most had severe, bilateral MNW on NCS. Some were asymptomatic, despite having moderate disease. The rate of recurrence following CTR was observed to be higher in wtATTR patients than the general population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".