Cardiac autonomic modulation in individuals with controlled and uncomplicated hypertension during exercise-heat stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impaired cardiac autonomic modulation is implicated in the development of hypertension. Exercise improves sympathovagal balance and is often prescribed for hypertension management. Environmental conditions, however, are not considered during the development of these exercise recommendations. We examined cardiac autonomic modulation, assessed using heart rate variability (HRV), in individuals (49–77 years) with ( n = 20) and without ( n = 28) controlled, uncomplicated hypertension performing three 30 min bouts of exercise (light, moderate, and vigorous) in dry heat (40.2 ± 0.3 °C, 17% ± 7% relative humidity), each separated by 15 min breaks. Regardless of intensity, short bouts of exercise-heat stress did not significantly disrupt HRV in physically active individuals with hypertension relative to normotensives. Take-home message During short bouts of light-to-vigorous exercise in the heat, controlled and uncomplicated hypertension did not significantly modulate HRV in physically active individuals. These findings can be used to refine guidance on use of exercise for hypertension management in the heat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".