MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385689290 · doi:10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00159-x

Standardising acute myeloid leukaemia classification systems: a perspective from a panel of international experts

2023· review· en· W4385689290 on OpenAlexaff
Rory M. Shallis, Naval Daver, Jessica K. Altman, Rami S. Komrokji, Daniel A. Pollyea, Talha Badar, Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Vijaya Raj Bhatt, Stéphane de Botton, Adolfo de la Fuente Burguera, Hetty E. Carraway, Pinkal Desai, Richard Dillon, Nicolas Duployez, Firas El Chaer, Amir T. Fathi, Sylvie Freeman, Ivana Gojo, Michael R. Grunwald, Brian A. Jonas, Marina Konopleva, Tara L. Lin, Gabriel N. Mannis, John Mascarenhas, Laura C. Michaelis, Alice S. Mims, Pau Montesinos, Olga Pozdnyakova, Keith W. Pratz, Andre C. Schuh, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Catherine C. Smith, Maximilian Stahl, Marion Subklewe, Geoffrey L. Uy, Maria Teresa Voso, Roland B. Walter, Eunice S. Wang, Joshua F. Zeidner, Andrius Žučenka, Amer M. Zeidan

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Haematology · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCancer Research UK
KeywordsMedicineMyeloid leukaemiaPerspective (graphical)Intensive care medicineDiseaseDrug responseHealth careClinical trialRisk analysis (engineering)DrugComputer scienceImmunologyArtificial intelligencePathologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.052
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.061
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.276

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0520.061
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0050.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.234
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet HaematologySame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207