MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Load-Flow Time-Series Simulation of a Distribution Grid with PV Modules and Voltage Regulation

2023· article· en· W4385694922 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptimal Power Flow Distribution
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemGridAC powerVoltageComputer scienceVoltage regulationVoltElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Load-flow time-series (LFTS) simulation is a common type of simulation used for assessing the power flow and the system voltage over a large time window for renewable energy integration studies. This paper presents a JavaScript-based execution of LFTS simulations in EMTP software and analyzes the effect of photovoltaic (PV) generation, volt-var control, and voltage regulators on the grid voltage for the IEEE-34 benchmark distribution grid. This study considers realistic profiles for the load demand and the PV generation. The accuracy of the LFTS simulation results is verified by comparison with time-domain simulation results. The results show that a combined usage of voltage regulators and volt-var control can help to mitigate undervoltage issues on a highly loaded node if sufficient PV generation is installed. Volt-var control provides additional support for the grid voltage without significantly impacting the active power flow at the distribution grid's connection point with the transmission grid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score0.414

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimal Power Flow DistributionFrench-language works237,207