The Impact of Change Management on the Organizational Climate: An Analytical Study of the Opinions of a Sample of Workers at Al-Kindi Hospital in Baghdad Governorate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Objective to Recognize the Relationship between Organizational Climate and Change Management at Canadian Hospital research ", the researcher used the exploratory curriculum in a scanning manner to fit it and the nature of the research problem, The research community and its samples were identified from its boundaries of a group of Canadian hospital staff Questionnaire form was distributed as a data collection tool and 30 questionnaire forms were distributed to hospital staff and fully recovered and analysed in the programme (SPSS) In the light of the findings, the researcher found that there was a strong, statistically significant, moral firsthand link between change management and the organizational climate at an indicative level (0.05) and an indicative level recorded (0.001), and a statistically significant moral effect of change management dimensions (Change in organizational structure, technological change, change in functions) and organizational climate at an indicative level (0.05) and at an indicative level recorded (0.001). The research recommended that the hospital's managerial leadership should recognize the importance of positive change and the need to prepare its cadres to accept change, that modern management should assess the different alternatives available before making decisions, and that they must have a plan to manage resistance and motivate staff to change, including open and transparent communication with staff and provide them with training and support. Leaders and managers must also adopt a comprehensive change management approach, including planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation. They must clearly define goals and expectations and provide the necessary resources to achieve them
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".