Synthesized <scp>7T MPRAGE</scp> From <scp>3T MPRAGE</scp> Using Generative Adversarial Network and Validation in Clinical Brain Imaging: A Feasibility Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ultra-high field 7T MRI can provide excellent tissue contrast and anatomical details, but is often cost prohibitive, and is not widely accessible in clinical practice. PURPOSE: To generate synthetic 7T images from widely acquired 3T images with deep learning and to evaluate the feasibility of this approach for brain imaging. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: 33 healthy volunteers and 89 patients with brain diseases, divided into training, and evaluation datasets in the ratio 4:1. SEQUENCE AND FIELD STRENGTH: T1-weighted nonenhanced or contrast-enhanced magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo sequence at both 3T and 7T. ASSESSMENT: A generative adversarial network (SynGAN) was developed to produce synthetic 7T images from 3T images as input. SynGAN training and evaluation were performed separately for nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced paired acquisitions. Qualitative image quality of acquired 3T and 7T images and of synthesized 7T images was evaluated by three radiologists in terms of overall image quality, artifacts, sharpness, contrast, and visualization of vessel using 5-point Likert scales. STATISTICAL TESTS: Wilcoxon signed rank tests to compare synthetic 7T images with acquired 7T and 3T images and intraclass correlation coefficients to evaluate interobserver variability. P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 122 paired 3T and 7T MRI scans, 66 were acquired without contrast agent and 56 with contrast agent. The average time to generate synthetic images was ~11.4 msec per slice (2.95 sec per participant). The synthetic 7T images achieved significantly improved tissue contrast and sharpness in comparison to 3T images in both nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced subgroups. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference between acquired 7T and synthetic 7T images in terms of all the evaluation criteria for both nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced subgroups (P ≥ 0.180). DATA CONCLUSION: The deep learning model has potential to generate synthetic 7T images with similar image quality to acquired 7T images. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".