MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385723023 · doi:10.1061/9780784485033.041

Advanced Multi-Sensor Inspection Critical Condition Assessment on Wastewater Infrastructure

2023· article· en· W4385723023 on OpenAlexaffabout
Csaba Ékes

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsCoquitlam College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCritical infrastructureWastewaterComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceReliability engineeringEngineeringComputer securityEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SewerVUE Technology (SewerVUE) was subcontracted by Whissell Contracting and the city of Calgary to inspect two critical sanitary trunks located under Memorial Drive in Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Measurements of sediment levels, structural defects, and wall thicknesses of approximately 600 linear meters of 1,200 mm I.D. and 1,950 mm I.D. R.C.P. were taken. An advanced multi-sensor robotic float equipped with HD closed circuit television (CCTV), sonar, and 3D Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) was used. Quantifications of the staining and sediment deposits throughout the pipe were reported along with joints and wall loss. Equipped with this data, the city of Calgary and its engineers can make evidence-based decisions regarding the pipes’ rehabilitative needs. This case study demonstrates the use of advanced pipe condition assessment technologies as a cost-effective, non-destructive means to refine the estimated remaining useful life (RUL) of an interceptor, accurately determine the overall severity of pipe degradation, and provide a basis for improved cost allocation or timing of rehabilitation efforts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical Methods and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207