Approximate Gaussian variance inference for state‐space models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary State‐space models require an accurate knowledge of the process error () and measurement error () covariance matrices for exact state estimation. Even though the matrix can be, in many situations, considered to be known from the measuring instrument specifications, it is still a challenge to infer the matrix online while providing reliable estimates along with a low computational cost. In this article, we propose an analytically tractable online Bayesian inference method for inferring the matrix in state‐space models. We refer to this method as approximate Gaussian variance inference (AGVI) using which we are able to treat the error variance and covariance terms in the full matrix as Gaussian hidden states and infer them simultaneously with the other hidden states in a closed‐form manner. The two case studies show that the method is able to provide statistically consistent estimates for the mean and uncertainties of the error variance terms for univariate and multivariate cases. The method also exceeds the performance of the existing adaptive Kalman filter methods both in terms of accuracy and computational efficiency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".