Triple Band Reflective Metasurface Based Linear to Circular Polarization Converter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Converting the polarization of electromagnetic waves from linear to circular is required for many microwave applications. This article discusses the use of metasurface MS based reflective surface for converting the polarization from linear to circular. A new MS element is proposed to manipulate the phase, amplitude, and polarization of waves. It consists of two tilted and crossed bi-directional metallic arrows with elliptical ring. By applying two small slits in the long arrow, the operating bandwidth of the proposed structure is significantly increased. The geometrical dimensions of this MS reflective element are chosen so that the magnitudes of the co-polarized and cross-polarized reflected wave components are nearly equal while maintaining a ±90 degree phase difference. Linear to dual circular polarization conversation has been achieved at three frequency bands. The simulated results show that right hand circular polarized (RHCP) waves can be sensed in 14.1-15.8 GHz and 25.2-41.5 GHz while the left hand circular polarized wave (LHCP) can be observed from 45.75 to 49 GHz with y-polarized incident wave. The proposed MS structure has a high energy conversation efficiency (ECE) above 98%. For more validation a $20\times 20$ MS elements arranged in two-dimensional rectangular lattice and simulated to verify the results of the single element. Moreover, the polarization conversion ratio (PCR) is calculated beside the circular polarization conversion ratio, ellipticity and elliptical angle to detect the direction of the reflected CP wave.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".