An Iterative Wiener Filter Based on a Fourth-Order Tensor Decomposition
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work focuses on linear system identification problems in the framework of the Wiener filter. Specifically, it addresses the challenging identification of systems characterized by impulse responses of long length, which poses significant difficulties due to the existence of large parameter space. The proposed solution targets a dimensionality reduction of the problem by involving the decomposition of a fourth-order tensor, using low-rank approximations in conjunction with the nearest Kronecker product. In addition, the rank of the tensor is controlled and limited to a known value without involving any approximation technique. The final estimate is obtained based on a combination of four (shorter) optimal filters, which are alternatively iterated. As a result, the designed iterative Wiener filter outperforms the traditional counterpart, being more robust to the accuracy of the statistics’ estimates and/or noisy conditions. In addition, simulations performed in the context of acoustic echo cancellation indicate that the proposed iterative Wiener filter that exploits this fourth-order tensor decomposition achieves better performance as compared to some previously developed solutions based on lower decomposition levels. This study could further lead to the development of computationally efficient tensor-based adaptive filtering algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it