MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385743359 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31193-2_2

Pre-existing Mathematics Teacher Characteristics

2023· book-chapter· en· W4385743359 on OpenAlexaff
Olive Chapman

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematics education in the digital era · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics educationPerspective (graphical)Teacher preparationTeacher educationPedagogyComputer scienceMathematicsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter addresses the pre-existing mathematics teacher characteristics (PMTC) of prospective mathematics teachers on entry to their teacher education program. Pre-existing teacher characteristics include abilities, knowledge, and attitudes that a candidate for admission to a teacher preparation program possesses on entry, as well as a candidate’s aptitude for teaching. The chapter provides an overview of a survey of mathematics education research for the period 2000 to 2020 with a focus on the three categories of the types and nature of pre-existing teacher characteristics the studies addressed. These categories emerging from the survey are pre-existing mathematical content knowledge and skills, pre-existing mathematics-related pedagogical knowledge and ability, and pre-existing mathematics-related beliefs. The studies are also discussed from the perspective of the evolution of the research on PMTC and implications regarding future evolution of research on PMTC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMathematics education in the digital eraSame topicMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesFrench-language works237,207