The late-evolving salmon and trout join the GnRH1 club
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although it is known that the whitefish, an ancient salmonid, expresses three distinct gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) forms in the brain, it has been thought that the later-evolving salmonids (salmon and trout) had only two types of GnRH: GnRH2 and GnRH3. We now provide evidence for the expression of GnRH1 in the gonads of Atlantic salmon by rapid amplification of cDNA ends, real-time quantitative PCR and immunohistochemistry. We examined six different salmonid genomes and found that each assembly has one gene that likely encodes a viable GnRH1 prepropeptide. In contrast to both functional GnRH2 and GnRH3 paralogs, the GnRH1 homeolog can no longer express the hormone. Furthermore, the viable salmonid GnRH1 mRNA is composed of only three exons, rather than the four exons that build the GnRH2 and GnRH3 mRNAs. Transcribed gnrh1 is broadly expressed (in 17/18 tissues examined), with relative abundance highest in the ovaries. Expression of the gnrh2 and gnrh3 mRNAs is more restricted, primarily to the brain, and not in the gonads. The GnRH1 proximal promoter presents composite binding elements that predict interactions with complexes that contain diverse cell fate and differentiation transcription factors. We provide immunological evidence for GnRH1 peptide in the nucleus of 1-year-old type A spermatogonia and cortical alveoli oocytes. GnRH1 peptide was not detected during other germ cell or reproductive stages. GnRH1 activity in the salmonid gonad may occur only during early stages of development and play a key role in a regulatory network that controls mitotic and/or meiotic processes within the germ cell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".