MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385753761 · doi:10.1117/12.2670836

Rapid ultraviolet photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy of fresh tissue sections using voice-coil stage scanning (Withdrawal Notice)

2023· article· en· W4385753761 on OpenAlexaff
Brendyn D. Cikaluk, Brendon S. Restall, Nathaniel J. M. Haven, Matthew T. Martell, Ewan A. McAllister, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceVoice coilUltravioletMicroscopyBiomedical engineeringPhotoacoustic imaging in biomedicineResolution (logic)OpticsSampling (signal processing)MicroscopeElectromagnetic coilRemote sensingComputer scienceOptoelectronicsArtificial intelligencePhysicsMedicineGeologyDetector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is an unmet need for virtual histology technologies which can rapidly image mm-scale regions of fresh tissue with fine-resolution. This work demonstrates an Ultraviolet Photoacoustic Remote Sensing (UV-PARS) system which employs voice-coil stage scanning to rapidly image mm-scale areas of fresh tissue with sampling resolution as low as 400 nm. Here we show 4x5mm2 UV-PARS images at sub-micron sampling resolutions in under three minutes. The combination of rapid imaging rates and fine-resolutions achievable with this system enhances the potential diagnostic utility of UV-PARS microscopy and could allow for future translation to the surgical suite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207