MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385754886 · doi:10.17771/pucrio.acad.63642

O IMPACTO DO RUÍDO URBANO: ESTUDO DE CASO DE TEMPLOS RELIGIOSOS NA CIDADE DO RIO DE JANEIRO

2021· dissertation· pt· W4385754886 on OpenAlexaff
Claudio Luiz Strino

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Development and Societal Issues
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[pt] A pesquisa analisou o ruído urbano e suas implicações, e o Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança, suas necessidades e mecanismos necessários a sua realização, assim como os problemas que podem advir da implantação de novos empreendimentos pela falta de regulamentação das prefeituras que não o adotaram dentro das suas políticas e estratégias relacionadas à urbanização das cidades, onde em razão da crescente industrialização e ampliação dos estabelecimentos comerciais, sem qualquer planejamento prévio. Dentro dos parâmetros impactantes, com a implantação do Estudo de Impacto de Vizinhança analisamos o ruído urbano e as implicações geradoras do incomodo sonoro, uma vez que o aumento dos níveis de ruído é crescente e fruto do crescimento desordenado das cidades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.176
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Development and Societal IssuesFrench-language works237,207