MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385755243 · doi:10.1117/12.2670968

Multi-modal functional sensorless adaptive optics for small animal retinal imaging

2023· article· en· W4385755243 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Song, Yusi Miao, Joanne A. Matsubara, Marinko V. Šarunic, Myeong Jin Ju

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRetinalAdaptive opticsLipofuscinOptical coherence tomographyRetinaMacular degenerationAnimal modelComputer scienceRetinal pigment epitheliumOpticsBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceBiologyOphthalmologyPathologyMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proposed preclinical study investigates pathological characteristics of retinal diseases such as Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) with transgenic small animal models using a multi-modal functional small animal retinal imaging system. For characterizing the animal models, we visualize the melanin concentration, lipofuscin accumulation, and choriocapillaris using a single imaging system. The system implements Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography (PS-OCT), fluorescence Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (fSLO), and Sensorless Adaptive Optics (SAO) for the visualizations of pathological features. As preliminary data, we acquired three different mice models and visualized the outer retinal thickness and melanin concentration. The newly developing system is expected to provide multilateral perspectives for further studies in AMD, enabling vision scientists to investigate the correlations between melanin, lipofuscin, and choriocapillaris for the root cause of AMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRetinal Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207