MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385755562 · doi:10.1155/2023/1855985

Preliminary Assessment of Reference Region Quantification and Reduced Scanning Times for [ <sup>18</sup> F]SynVesT-1 PET in Parkinson’s Disease

2023· article· en· W4385755562 on OpenAlexafffund
Kelly Smart, Carme Uribe, Kimberly L. Desmond, Sarah L. Martin, Neil Vasdev, Antonio P. Strafella

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Imaging · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCanada Research ChairsEuropean CommissionAzrieli FoundationCanada Foundation for InnovationWeston Brain InstituteMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsNuclear medicineMedicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Synaptic density in the central nervous system can be measured in vivo using PET with [ 18 F]SynVesT-1. While [ 18 F]SynVesT-1 has been proven to be a powerful radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson’s disease (PD), its currently validated acquisition and quantification protocols are invasive and technically challenging in these populations due to the arterial sampling and relatively long scanning times. The objectives of this work were to evaluate a noninvasive (reference tissue) quantification method for [ 18 F]SynVesT-1 in PD patients and to determine the minimum scan time necessary for accurate quantification. [ 18 F]SynVesT-1 PET scans were acquired in 5 patients with PD and 3 healthy control subjects for 120 min with arterial blood sampling. Quantification was performed using the one-tissue compartment model (1TCM) with arterial input function, as well as with the simplified reference tissue model (SRTM) to estimate binding potential ([Formula: see text]) using centrum semiovale (CS) as a reference region. The SRTM2 method was used with [Formula: see text] fixed to either a sample average value (0.037 min -1 ) or a value estimated first through coupled fitting across regions for each participant. Direct SRTM estimation and the Logan reference region graphical method were also evaluated. There were no significant group differences in CS volume, radiotracer uptake, or efflux ([Formula: see text]). Each fitting method produced [Formula: see text] estimates in close agreement with those derived from the 1TCM (subject [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]), with no difference in bias between the control and PD groups. With SRTM2, [Formula: see text] estimates from truncated scan data as short as 80 min produced values in excellent agreement with the data from the full 120 min scans ([Formula: see text]). While these are preliminary results from a small sample of patients with PD ([Formula: see text]), this work suggests that accurate synaptic density quantification may be performed without blood sampling and with scan time under 90 minutes. If further validated, these simplified procedures for [ 18 F]SynVesT-1 PET quantification can facilitate its application as a clinical research imaging technology and allow for larger study samples and include a broader scope of patients including those with neurodegenerative diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular ImagingSame topicMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207