MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4385757409 · doi:10.1109/lwc.2023.3304477

IRS Element Selection Using LSTM-Based Deep Learning for UAV Communications

2023· article· en· W4385757409 on OpenAlexaff
Sobia Jangsher, Arafat Al‐Dweik, Emad Alsusa

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBit error rateSelection (genetic algorithm)Artificial intelligenceComputational complexity theoryWord error rateCompensation (psychology)AlgorithmComputationMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter proposes using deep learning (DL) for intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) element selection to reduce the bit error rate (BER) of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) communications affected by imperfect phase estimation and compensation. In the presence of phase errors, increasing the number of elements does not necessarily reduce the BER. In contrast, muting certain IRS elements can improve BER. However, solving the optimization problem heuristically is extremely complex because it requires evaluating BER expressions numerically for an enormous number of cases. Consequently, a long shortterm memory (LSTM)-based element selection (ES) technique is proposed to reduce the substantial complexity inherent in the conventional solution. A supervised learning approach with offline training is adopted where the decision of ES is made based on the phase estimation error parameter j. The obtained results show that the computation time of the proposed technique is 100 times less than that of state-of-the-art algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.778
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207